| To: | Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system |
| From: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:37:42 -0400 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4F90DDFB.8080409@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20120419204235.GA18822@xxxxxxxxxx> <1334886837.5884.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120420030651.GC18822@xxxxxxxxxx> <4F90DDFB.8080409@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Hi, Mark - On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 01:54:35PM +1000, Mark Goodwin wrote: > [...] > For an RPM spec+tarball driven build that does not use Makepkgs > I guess we'd have to compute pcp_lib_dir and siblings in the %prep > section, prior to calling %configure .. right? Nope, I think the rpm spec's autoconf & %configure alone should do the right thing, since the macro's supplied directories are already just right for Fedora/RHEL. - FChE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system, Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] RFC: invocation of revised configure/make system, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |