On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:57:29AM +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:
> Martin Hicks wrote:
> ...
>> commit b3549934521ea99482467345388e7000235eae9d
>> Author: Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue Nov 10 13:31:21 2009 -0500
>>
>> Fix PCP_BINADM_DIR on ia64/linux
>> It should be /usr/lib/pcp/bin. Nothing should be in
>> /usr/lib64 on ia64.
>>
>
> Hi Martin, just wondering what the story behind this change is?
>
> The original change was to conform with the Fedora rules
> (and avoid rpmlint complaints). This has something to do with
> archs that support multilib. BTW, I don't have access to any ia64
> h/w any more ..
I just thought this was wrong. We have PCP_LIB_DIR as /usr/lib on ia64,
but PCP_BINADM_DIR was /usr/lib64/pcp/bin
There is nothing else in /usr/lib64 on an ia64 machine, so I assumed
this must be wrong. If this patch is wrong then please enlighten me :)
The test looked a lot like an x86 vs. x86_64 arch test that went awry
and also caught ia64.
mh
|