Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc

pcp

Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready

To:	Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready
From:	Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:14:30 -0600
Cc:	kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<19190.33102.849090.560720@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20091106164605.GH11632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1257540818.2905.18.camel@localhost> <19190.33102.849090.560720@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 07:29:02PM +1100, Max Matveev wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:53:38 +1100, Ken McDonell wrote:
> 
>  kenj> However from reading the code, it looks like for a PMDA connected via a
>  kenj> pipe, the supported protocols in the pmcd config file are "binary" or
>  kenj> "binary notready".
> This is correct.

Yep, confirmed.  I'll fix my comment and push out my fix.

mh

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready, Martin Hicks Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready, Ken McDonell Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready, Max Matveev Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready, Martin Hicks <= Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready, Nathan Scott

Previous by Date:	Re: [pcp] [resend] Derived Metrics - RFC, Max Matveev
Next by Date:	pmdumptext and x11 deps, Martin Hicks
Previous by Thread:	Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready, Max Matveev
Next by Thread:	Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready, Nathan Scott
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]