On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 08:17:04AM +1100, Ken McDonell wrote:
> Can you send me the 216.full file ... I'll tweak the test accordingly?
>
> I think 600 is one of those problematic ones ... send me the output from
>
> ls -l 600*
>
> and the 600.full file and I'll see if I can sort it out. The logic in
> 600 for picking which is the expected outcome is very convoluted ... the
> fact that we have FOUR possible linux output files gives some indication
> of the mess we're trying to untangle.
http://oss.sgi.com/~mort/216.full
http://oss.sgi.com/~mort/600.full
and:
pcpqa@opensuse11-1:~/pcpqa> ls -l 600*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 pcpqa users 4172 2009-10-30 10:44 600
-rw-r--r-- 1 pcpqa users 1503 2009-10-30 10:39 600.full
-rw-r--r-- 2 pcpqa users 1480 2009-10-27 15:17 600.out
-rw-r--r-- 1 pcpqa users 1554 2009-10-30 10:39 600.out.bad
-rw-r--r-- 1 pcpqa users 1483 2009-10-27 15:17 600.out.irix
-rw-r--r-- 1 pcpqa users 1530 2009-10-27 15:17 600.out.linux.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 pcpqa users 1528 2009-10-27 15:17 600.out.linux.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 pcpqa users 1528 2009-10-27 15:17 600.out.linux.2
-rw-r--r-- 2 pcpqa users 1480 2009-10-27 15:17 600.out.linux.3
216 seems to have 4 different addidions and subtractions. I looked a
bit, but it wasn't clear what the best route was to fix this test.
600 seems to be using the linux.3 output file correctly. I did verify
that this test passes on my glibc-2.9 debian machine.
mh
|