pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] QA status - warning

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] QA status - warning
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 21:08:58 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: PCP Mailing List <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51899D55.20202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <51823EB3.1030003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <410335498.9468044.1367544497012.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <851894341.11621320.1367881806756.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <2055430036.11651048.1367887214801.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <51889F39.8060206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <86805787.12576575.1367970791260.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <51899D55.20202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: OPqepVcnWJxSV3maJrrCkRV9/dxUeQ==
Thread-topic: QA status - warning

----- Original Message -----
> On 08/05/13 09:53, Nathan Scott wrote:
> 
> > No problem.  I wonder if the pmdammv Install script should strive for a
> > DSO installation by default, since thats what the build/packaging does?
> > (not sure if that is possible with pmdaproc.sh though)
> >
> 
> I considered that, but a quick look at pmdaproc.sh convinced me to walk
> away quietly and slowly.
> 

Hah.

> So with all the latest commits from my tree and the oss.sgi.com dev
> tree, I'm still seeing these failures:
> 
> 024 051 359 367 371 374 375 513 532 652
> 
> on this host
> 
> vm03        3.8.0    x86_64  Fedora 18 (Spherical Cow)
> 
> I won't get much of chance to investigate further today I'm afraid.
> 

Could you forward the full "check" output (perhaps privately if its long)?
(with .bad info) - I'll see if I recognise any likely culprits.

thanks!

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>