pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp-gui updates

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp-gui updates
From: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:34:44 +1000
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <639360674.1089311284697171333.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <19602.55560.799554.545248@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <639360674.1089311284697171333.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:19:31 +1000 (EST), Nathan Scott wrote:

 nathans> Happy to switch if there's no issues.  Will there be any
 nathans> issues with implementing the "proper" packaging I wonder?
 nathans> i.e. http://doc.trolltech.com/4.6/deployment-mac.html

 nathans> (IOW, where the Qt frameworks we link with are shipped with
 nathans> the PCP GUI package, such that no separate Qt installation
 nathans> needed on users machine?)

I don't think there would be - my experience with troll's is that if
you let them control the build then they make sure it works most of
the time.

Personally I don't like private frameworks for apps on Mac OS - if
done without too much thinking it just adds to bloat: consider what
would happen if private frameworks ship with pcp-gui - 4 .app
bundles, 4 copies of Qt?

 nathans> If that can be made to work, lets switch for 1.5.0 ... ?
I'll play a bit with this.

Meanwhile you can take a look at macg++ branch (especially the last
commit) in my pcp-gui git tree:

 git://oss.sgi.com/makc/pcp-gui macg++

Max Matveev (2):
      Use g++ and make to build on Mac OS X
      Don't ship PCP icons twice

 man/html/images/GNUmakefile |    2 +-
 src/chart/GNUmakefile       |    2 +-
 src/include/buildrules      |    5 +++--
 src/query/GNUmakefile       |    1 -
 src/time/GNUmakefile        |    1 -
 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

max

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>