pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Containers analysis with PCP

To: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Containers analysis with PCP
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 20:05:05 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <54D95796.9050106@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2100915892.5240937.1422867358164.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <768474811.5242777.1422867576642.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0m7fvr3tem.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <54D9447B.203@xxxxxxxxxx> <743115533.1781377.1423528533840.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54D955EB.4040201@xxxxxxxxxx> <54D95796.9050106@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: FiEQAOeTe9EhTuqdCVJkg1XdOKbr+A==
Thread-topic: Containers analysis with PCP

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> Also, would it be a bit more user-friendly if the external instance
> names were the container name instead of the container-id?

Yeah, I thought alot about that but went with the hash in the end because it
means we need to do alot less work in the PMDA for each instance refresh.

> BTW  pminfo -f containers.state.running  shows none are running, but I know
> for sure that one of them is.

Hmm, thats a good clue.  Can you send through the container.pid values?, keen
to see what pmdaroot discovered there.

thanks.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>