| To: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Containers analysis with PCP |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:56:52 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20150210023410.GE25151@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <2100915892.5240937.1422867358164.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <768474811.5242777.1422867576642.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0m7fvr3tem.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <1602407544.1781133.1423528333125.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150210023410.GE25151@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | F1Yp78b57Cv+d9niURMvgQ/11O2mtw== |
| Thread-topic: | Containers analysis with PCP |
----- Original Message ----- > [...] > Please check closer. Nothing appears to have changed about container > naming policy or mechanism (pmdas still store it as char*'s, > resolution still done repeatedly and ambiguously), which represented > the bulk of the concern. I understood your concern, but I was then and remain now unconvinced of any genuine issues there. Arguing about it then, as now, is sure to be counter-productive, and time is precious. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Containers analysis with PCP, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ipv6 and qa/533 question, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Containers analysis with PCP, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Containers analysis with PCP, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |