pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev)

To: Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev)
From: Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:12:17 +1100
Cc: Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4AF9EFD9.1020802@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20091110183324.GE5895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AF9EFD9.1020802@xxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:57:29 +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote:

 goodwinos> The original change was to conform with the Fedora rules
 goodwinos> (and avoid rpmlint complaints). This has something to do with
 goodwinos> archs that support multilib. BTW, I don't have access to any ia64
 goodwinos> h/w any more ..

Does Fedora have a concept of libexec? Because this is what those
binaries are, they're not libraries, why are we pushing them in
/usr/lib?

max

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>