| To: | Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev) |
| From: | Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:12:17 +1100 |
| Cc: | Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4AF9EFD9.1020802@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20091110183324.GE5895@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AF9EFD9.1020802@xxxxxxxxx> |
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:57:29 +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote: goodwinos> The original change was to conform with the Fedora rules goodwinos> (and avoid rpmlint complaints). This has something to do with goodwinos> archs that support multilib. BTW, I don't have access to any ia64 goodwinos> h/w any more .. Does Fedora have a concept of libexec? Because this is what those binaries are, they're not libraries, why are we pushing them in /usr/lib? max |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev), Trevor Hurst |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev), Mark Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev), Trevor Hurst |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (mort-dev), Mark Goodwin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |