| To: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready |
| From: | Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 8 Nov 2009 19:29:02 +1100 |
| Cc: | Martin Hicks <mort@xxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1257540818.2905.18.camel@localhost> |
| References: | <20091106164605.GH11632@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1257540818.2905.18.camel@localhost> |
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:53:38 +1100, Ken McDonell wrote: kenj> I'm not sure when this bit of "notready" fluff got added to pmcd's kenj> config file (the pmcd<->PMDA protocol support has been there for a long kenj> time, since the first Oracle PMDA was written). It was added at the same time then async support was added - we simply could not find a better way to deal with races between HUTA pmda starting up and pmcd wanting to talk to it. kenj> However from reading the code, it looks like for a PMDA connected via a kenj> pipe, the supported protocols in the pmcd config file are "binary" or kenj> "binary notready". This is correct. max |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] [resend] Derived Metrics - RFC, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] [resend] Derived Metrics - RFC, Max Matveev |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Regression for handling of ipc_prot=notready, Martin Hicks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |