| To: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] PCP 2.8.0 released |
| From: | Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:22:48 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <821734226.3286021239317672726.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1486723217.3286001239317481254.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <821734226.3286021239317672726.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
>>>>> "nscott" == Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: nscott> I wonder if /etc/rc.d/init.d should ever be used? Perhaps the order nscott> of directories should be changed? (else, we could just remove that nscott> first directory - perhaps it was for IRIX? Max do you remember?) Definitely not Irix - IIRC it was done for either RH or SuSE. SuSE 10 has etc/rc.d/init.d as symlink to /etc/init.d which sort of suggests that it was done for RH - ask markgw. max |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] PCP 2.8.0 released, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] PCP 2.8.0 released, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] PCP 2.8.0 released, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] PCP 2.8.0 released, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |