| To: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (2.7.8-20090401) |
| From: | Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 5 Apr 2009 15:00:01 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1197992980.2176011238625899529.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <177355351.2175551238625529014.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1197992980.2176011238625899529.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
>>>>> "nscott" == Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: nscott> We need to talk about this not-linking-with-libpcp issue (and nscott> re-writing pmGetConfig() as a result) ... whats the goal nscott> there? (i.e. under what siuations would someone have nscott> libpcp_mmv but not libpcp available). The library was written to be used for instrumenting fs2d and one of the requirements at the time was that libpcp cannot be used - CHAOS people did not want to create a dependency on pcp_eoe so the static library was used in that case. I guess it's not important anymore, especially if the only delivery vehicle for the new library is pcp. max |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | pcp updates, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcpqa updates, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] pcp updates (2.7.8-20090401), Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | taskset tools, David Wright |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |