| To: | Mark Goodwin <goodwinos@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions |
| From: | Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:35:26 +1100 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>, kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <498A6CD0.7010002@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1233627045.5518.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18825.23091.63084.898574@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1233742073.10265.1.camel@bozo> <1233786804.24330.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <498A6CD0.7010002@xxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:36:32 +1100, Mark Goodwin wrote: MG> BTW, Max, which bug-for-bugs in pmchart are you thinking of? MG> pmchart doesn't have any bugs ;-) Ok, WARs like counter-wrap detection in the fetchgroup code, GIF generation (can kmchart do that?), graph layout. max |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |