| To: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions |
| From: | Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:04:51 +1100 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1233627045.5518.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1233627045.5518.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:10:45 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: nscott> - Renaming kmchart/kmtime -> pmchart/pmtime is fine with me. I nscott> will keep symlinks for backward compatibility, etc. Unless you plan to provide bug-to-bug compatibility between kmchart and pmchart I think that renaming it will be a mistake: people who use pmchart now (not a lot of them but they do exists) will expect the new pmchart to behave the same way the old one behaves so you will need to support the same command line options, same behaviours etc. It would be easier to keep kmchart name and just let pmchart die. max |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Mark Goodwin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Mark Goodwin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |