| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Issues with 3.8 on rhel 6 (minor) and sles 11 (not as minor) |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 May 2013 19:28:54 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5192ABAD.80807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5192396A.3090600@xxxxxxx> <5192ABAD.80807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | OkMezz/2hHeLTpdJEtQ0RgePcBA2Bw== |
| Thread-topic: | Issues with 3.8 on rhel 6 (minor) and sles 11 (not as minor) |
----- Original Message ----- > ... > I agree python-ctypes should not be there ... but I'd like one of the python > pixies to chime in an confirm this ... otherwise some conditional spec file > glue may be required. *nod* - doesn't appear to be explicitly needed here either (perhaps its for an older RHEL variant). On my system this appears to be a virtual package provided by python: $ repoquery --whatprovides python-ctypes python-0:2.6.6-29.el6_3.3.x86_64 *shrug* - I guess the python packaging evolved differently on SLES. If it does turn out to be needed for older RHEL/Fedora that someone is still using, we can do the conditional Requires magic we use for other dependencies. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] FC18 status, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Issues with 3.8 on rhel 6 (minor) and sles 11 (not as minor), Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Issues with 3.8 on rhel 6 (minor) and sles 11 (not as minor), Josh Stone |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Issues with 3.8 on rhel 6 (minor) and sles 11 (not as minor), Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |