----- "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've been doing some QA coverage analysis, starting with libpcp and
> was
> more than a little surprised to find that the following routines have
> ZERO coverage across all the tests in the QA suite:
>
> ...
> who can point to QA test code that I've overlooked, or any volunteer
> willing to write the missing QA test cases so these routines are
> tested,
> which seems a minimal precondition for them remaining in the library.
Happy to see 'em go, I never know if I'm accidentally breaking these when
making changes in their proximity - they can always come back if/when there
is a genuine use case (and some tests).
cheers.
--
Nathan
|