| To: | "Zhang, Sonic" <sonic.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "PCP (E-mail)" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New failures for pcp-2.3.0-11 |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:04:27 +1100 |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:31:06 +1100." <Pine.SGI.4.40.0302171421430.14254395-100000@rattle.melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 14:31:06 +1100, Ken McDonell <kenmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Never seen this before. Since we do not explicitly use poll() in the PCP >source, my guess would be that this is some sort of local networking >problem associated with rsh or rcp between the QA machines. > >On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Zhang, Sonic wrote: >> poll: protocol failure in circuit setup The message comes from libc::rcmd_af (man rcmd). That function uses poll() to check if rsh to the target machine is working. AFAICT the message is issued when the target command dies prematurely. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New failures for pcp-2.3.0-11, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: New failures for pcp-2.3.0-11, Zhang, Sonic |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New failures for pcp-2.3.0-11, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | RE: New failures for pcp-2.3.0-11, Zhang, Sonic |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |