pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pcp updates: qa, docs, fixes

To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pcp updates: qa, docs, fixes
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 20:01:33 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150413130259.GJ13158@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <765204112.14979385.1428575388121.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mk2xk566h.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <1283758678.17040206.1428908657815.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150413130259.GJ13158@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: D6BbBpLVv9doJWb5VG1qrdZCjsbyaw==
Thread-topic: pcp updates: qa, docs, fixes

----- Original Message -----
> > [...]
> > > %dir /usr/share/pcp/webapps
> > [...]
> > So, /usr/share/pcp comes from package "pcp" and /usr/share/pcp/webapps
> > comes from package "pcp-webapi".  [...]
> 
> The confusion here is between "unowned" and "multiply-owned"
> directories.

Oh, interesting!  I didn't realise rpm supported this - good to know, yes,
we should definitely do that then.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>