| To: | nscott@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pcp updates |
| From: | Max Matveev <makc@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Mar 2008 22:42:04 +1100 |
| Cc: | markgw@xxxxxxx, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx, anibal@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <56613.192.168.3.1.1204803286.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> |
| References: | <47851.192.168.3.1.1204709786.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> <47CE6C3C.1010901@sgi.com> <49977.192.168.3.1.1204711129.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> <18383.54720.621894.212246@kuku.melbourne.sgi.com> <56613.192.168.3.1.1204803286.squirrel@mail.aconex.com> |
| Sender: | pcp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>>>>> "nscott" == nscott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>>>>> "nscott" == nscott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: nscott> Yeah, I'd rather have had a pcp-only directory, but it is nscott> evidentally not allowed on Debian (even X11, which usually nscott> has /usr/X11[R6]/bin as its own, is just a symlink back to nscott> /usr/bin, where all the X binaries are). >> Does Debian has concept of libexec? Because this is what BINADM really >> is. nscott> Can't find any other packages using a libexec, so I'm guessing not. Where is sendmail on debian? Or where does postfix puts its binaries? max |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: pcp updates, nscott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: pcp updates, nscott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pcp updates, nscott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pcp updates, nscott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |