| To: | Liming Wu <wulm.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] [patch] fix the pmiostat output samples's count issue |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 May 2016 21:52:00 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <6A799D6419DDBA43B657744DC4113882FE3F5674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <6A799D6419DDBA43B657744DC4113882FE3F5674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | AdGwEHgPgoVlqB0rQ5eS4sO5P/LTyLoN3EbD |
| Thread-topic: | [patch] fix the pmiostat output samples's count issue |
Hi Liming,
Thanks for reporting and fixing the problem ...
----- Original Message -----
> Hi
>
> There are only 2 samples when you specified 3 as follows.
> [...]
> src/python/pcp/pmcc.py | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
That approach accidentally introduces a problem elsewhere, so I ended up
fixing it in a different way. I've also updated some of the regression
tests to make sure we exercise this option some more (see qa/{1099,842}
if you're interested in that side of things).
Thanks again!
cheers.
--
Nathan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] kernel.all.uptime semantics, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: pmcc fix, marko merge, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | [patch] fix the pmiostat output samples's count issue, Wu, Liming |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates: miscellaneous, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |