pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp QA status

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp QA status
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:20:23 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Dave Brolley <brolley@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <000e01d1ce74$a2a42690$e7ec73b0$@internode.on.net>
References: <5767A046.3030207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <683173640.795045.1466575709412.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <196795449.1180629.1466661414760.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <576C31F0.8080305@xxxxxxxxxx> <2045474289.1477927.1466734119976.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <000e01d1ce74$a2a42690$e7ec73b0$@internode.on.net>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQFnLnc8h+koVAVkWI++LBthxhybJQF8y27CApNsZ1YBPyMFpwH3L9PsoJQec0D5sa27rQ==
Thread-topic: pcp QA status

----- Original Message -----
> > -----Original Message-----
> [...lotsa fixes...]
> qa/651 had wrong (looking) logic testing id pcp, then running pmproxy with -U
> myusername ... changed to -U pcp
> [...]
> 
> And it passes everywhere for me.
> 
> I'll leave it to someone who knows to explain this.

Its a bit of a mystery to me, but...

> All these changes are my latest round of commits.
> 

with these changes, its passing reliably for me too, including in the case
where it was failing reliably before.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>