pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp updates - mostly pmie

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp updates - mostly pmie
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 00:45:46 -0500 (EST)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1280806700.8858397.1392671124175.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5301AE80.6060703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <y0md2ilsrhf.fsf@xxxxxxxx> <5302691A.9090100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140217200456.GF18232@xxxxxxxxxx> <53026C3E.3080800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1280806700.8858397.1392671124175.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: QqUSLHp3L7kZeIvrIPYHIxeBpS2ypwLmDEaU
Thread-topic: pcp updates - mostly pmie

----- Original Message -----
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On 18/02/14 07:04, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > > ..
> > > Probably (though we're about to get an influx of new users).
> > 
> > I'd bet most of 'em are will be in the "don't care" camp, at least for
> > this level of detail.
> > 
> > >> Let's decide (not sure how) [...]
> > >
> > > Have a coin?  I call tails.  :-)
> > 
> > I call heads ... I think we need more than 2 voters ... 8^)>
> > 
> 
> I think explicitly listing the log file is useful to new punters.

Having played with the current code a bit, it sure looks neat to
have all of our (dazzling array of) daemons starting up with some
consistency now... so, bleurgh, I don't particularly care which
way either, just make 'em all the same.  Punters will learn, its
documented *everywhere*, maybe not so much value at boot time too.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>