| To: | Paul Smith <psmith@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] Derived Metrics and pmlogsummary.. ? Is it supposed to work? |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:57:31 +1000 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <0B1ABCB2-E4B0-42BD-924D-69ABD630B694@xxxxxxxxxx> |
----- Original Message ----- > ... > Why wouldn't it work in pmlogsummary? I suspect its to do with the way pmlogsummary is using a fairly low level interface (see pmFetchArchive(3)) to scan through every data point in the archive with no changes (ie. no interpolation, rate conversion, etc) ... this scanning is all done upfront before we look at the requested metrics at all. Ken might have a cunning plan to resolve this, but I suspect it wont be easy unfortunately. Might be worth considering alongside that other missing piece of log summary functionality - calculating the Nth percentile. That also would need some design-level surgery for logsummary, though probably they are orthogonal. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Derived Metrics and pmlogsummary.. ? Is it supposed to work?, Paul Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] Derived Metrics and pmlogsummary.. ? Is it supposed to work?, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Derived Metrics and pmlogsummary.. ? Is it supposed to work?, Paul Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] Derived Metrics and pmlogsummary.. ? Is it supposed to work?, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |