| To: | Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] problem with containers support and qa/977 |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Mar 2015 04:38:12 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1449873674.17987276.1425282066382.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <00a401d052cc$4349f230$c9ddd690$@internode.on.net> <648861550.17853434.1425259420402.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54F41392.90207@xxxxxxxxxx> <1449873674.17987276.1425282066382.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | gbjrybUf0kjnW1Sz2CGLZEkgUn4z6hLnZrUG |
| Thread-topic: | problem with containers support and qa/977 |
Got it - fix pushed in, can you verify the fix for me Mark? Certainly fixes the problem here, and yep definitely accidental fallout from the secure sockets option. +1 to fixing that code in the way Dave & I have discussed in the past, so that NSS/SSL is dynamically loaded. Would've avoided the conditional alternate code-path that caused this problem. Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- > ----- Original Message ----- > > On 03/02/2015 12:23 PM, Nathan Scott wrote: > > [...] > > Nathan, there seems to be a path thru __pmConnectPMCD where the containers > > feature requires the secure sockets feature. Is this expected? > > Definitely not expected! Thanks for the analysis, Mark - will look into > this immediately, I should be able to reproduce it now. > > cheers. > > -- > Nathan > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Build failure in dev - papi-related, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates: non-secure sockets container fix, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] problem with containers support and qa/977, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] problem with containers support and qa/977, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |