| To: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] patch pings |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Oct 2015 22:47:02 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp developers <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20151006021806.GF32129@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20151001203810.GB7968@xxxxxxxxxx> <201950110.49288798.1444090879133.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <20151006021806.GF32129@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | f/LOfEWzHltHeMSHXbJ7FxrhqV13mA== |
| Thread-topic: | patch pings |
----- Original Message ----- > Hi - > > > > fche/pmmgr > > [...] the branch is still missing the fix-up patch I sent you there. [...] > > I'm afraid I can't find it; feel free to apply it. > Really? This link I just sent you... http://pcp.io/pipermail/pcp/2015-May/007303.html contains this download link for the patch at the end... http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/pcp/attachments/20150512/dc4523ca/attachment.patch Without that, there can have been no testing of the pmie change with the pmmgr changes, since it removes the workaround. It'll need to be reviewed and merged - I'd prefer if you could do that, please, so we have some confidence that its been looked at and tested by someone who is using pmmgr and knows the code. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] patch pings, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] netstat output from proc pmda, Jamie Bainbridge |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] patch pings, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] patch pings, Frank Ch. Eigler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |