pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug/Issue tracker

To: Michele Baldessari <michele@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bug/Issue tracker
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:36:47 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <y0mvbgop6to.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20150420174712.GH18943@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5536B493.5070208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <681874759.4524910.1429676595258.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <y0mvbgop6to.fsf@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: KDzFRcu0MhM/kwLcTRGNGHbT/OGRLQ==
Thread-topic: Bug/Issue tracker

----- Original Message -----
> > [...]  Well the opportunity if before us right now to resolve this
> > since Michele is offering to do the work of consolidating the two
> > [...]
> 
> I missed where anyone volunteered to consolidate.  Last I read, he
> acknowleged it as essential, but that's not the same thing.

Assuming this, from your original mail Michele, is still the case...

| I think that to make things easier for users it makes more sense to
| switch to github fully for issue tracking purposes. If there is rough
| consensus on this, I'll work on some test scripts to migrate all bugs
| w/comments and attachments.

... it sounds like it'd be worth investigating the attachment side of
things further (as per Kens last mail).  If that's solvable, I guess we
have as "rough consensus" as we ever tend to get, so lets move forward.

Thanks for working on this.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>