Re: [pcp] pmServiceDiscoveryInterrupt() commit a8b87e2 et al.

[Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> 
> WRT the API, the various options for overloading the current strings
> were considered and discussed and, while I knew that changing the ABI
> could be problematic, it seemed to me that Nathan was encouraging the
> addition of a new options string. This in turn lead me to believe that
> it was not too late to change this API.

Yeah, this PMAPI addition can only be made via a new function.  IIRC
(gettin' old, there's a good chance I'm not RC), I had said something
to the effect that the two externally visible APIs would call a single
internal API, or the old would call the new with NULL options.  If I
didn't, that was the intention - sorry 'bout the ambiguity there.

cheers.

--
Nathan