Re: [pcp] qa failures on 32-bit debian 7.4

[Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> Usually our int64_t use is a result of some api or archive format
> constraint, so I was just hoping to make this obvious in the code that
> we're not relying on this week's definition of "long long" to make the
> code work.

Ah, fair enough.

> > Not really following the need for those macros there.  (return value
> > can always be down-cast for atomvalue.ul vs atomvalue.ull no?)
> 
> True ... the cast will produce an acceptable value, but maybe the wrong
> one.  Consider if long long was indeed 128 bits, then a very, very large

Heh, yep, I wasn't considering numbers beyond 64 bits :)

> Independent of using strtoint64 or strtoll, I need to audit all the code ...

cheers.

--
Nathan