| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] notes from buffalo pcp meetathon |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:40:46 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5451BCAF.8090403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20141029202342.GB8665@xxxxxxxxxx> <5451BCAF.8090403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | qaysRg25df7unoS1+tVshOcbrQLP5Q== |
| Thread-topic: | notes from buffalo pcp meetathon |
----- Original Message ----- > [...] > This would keep the discussion scope limited to one todo item per > comment, keep the related comments together, allow people to assign > items to themselves to avoid duplicated effort, etc, etc. > > If there is consensus around this suggestion, I'm willing to do the > initial bugzilla leg work. Sounds good to me. Chatting further to Joe in the evening about the cgroups item, that's something Red Hat need fairly quickly and isn't at the top of his list, so I agreed to take that one on (since I was the one who caused his last series to implode by adding in the blkio stats there :) ... I'll probably do that one next week, so feel free to leave that one off the bugzilla list. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] notes from buffalo pcp meetathon, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | QA Summary - status, Ken McDonell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] notes from buffalo pcp meetathon, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | QA Summary - status, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |