pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pcp-updates spin-rawhide, docs, pcp.spec.in fixes

To: myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pcp] pcp-updates spin-rawhide, docs, pcp.spec.in fixes
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 03:10:52 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <554C5FC8.5010304@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <878ud0kneb.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx> <554C5FC8.5010304@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: 3ovbHTpw7UsR7UESxcYIkOG//uZxig==
Thread-topic: pcp-updates spin-rawhide, docs, pcp.spec.in fixes

----- Original Message -----
> Hi,
> 
> On 2015-05-08 01:56, Lukas Berk wrote:
> > Author: Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> >     Wrap pcp-pmda-rpm and pcp-gui with proper %if checks
> >     
> >     pcp-pmda-rpm and pcp-gui aren't built on some platforms,
> >     wrapping them with proper checks so it doesn't fail on other platforms
> 
> now that you're working with packaging, are there any chances to
> separate pmdumptext from pcp-gui so that fewer dependencies would be
> pulled in when installing pmdumptext?

(good idea & definitely worth a look - I'd forgotten all about that)

> ldd indicates that QtCore is
> needed by pmdumptext (not sure why?)

It uses libpcp_qmc (our Qt metrics class), and QString's, QTextStream, and
other Qt classes.

> but otherwise pmdumptext has much
> shorter list of DSO dependencies that pmchart so it might make sense to
> separate them.

Yep.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>