Re: [pcp] Planning for PCP 4.0

[Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With PCP 3.5 released, we've been giving some thought to the scope of
> work to be attempted for the next major release, tentatively dubbed
> "4.0".
> 
> I've drafted an initial document that reflects my initial thoughts, and
> would encourage others to engage in a discussion on what we should be
> adding and removing.

Could also consider making binary pmns format 2 (with checksums) the
default now?

cheers.

-- 
Nathan