| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] linux pmda badness |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:35:16 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <54BEFF0D.4020902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <54B444A8.8070005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <331211176.14228104.1421801734447.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <54BEFF0D.4020902@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | 2ur32ICCEanxvq/HvZuVZd4tz+jD5A== |
| Thread-topic: | linux pmda badness |
----- Original Message ----- > [...] > Without some extra semantics from somewhere, even this is doomed ... on my > local machine there are duplicates in the help text ... > Yeah, gets more complicated too - the contents of /proc/interrupts differs between each architecture and that final column is arbitrary text. I think the current strategy of using the first column in the metric name is a good one, if we can just make the item numbering persist. cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: scsi indom in linux PMDA - issues!, Frank Ch. Eigler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] scsi indom in linux PMDA - issues!, Mark Goodwin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] linux pmda badness, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | pcp updates: kenj: pmlogextract + qa, Dave Brolley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |