pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] qa/511 failing

To: David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] qa/511 failing
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 07:02:43 +1100
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130129113833.1cc959f3@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1359417344.4029.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <857823097.12680679.1359418349671.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130129111400.0bb0df54@xxxxxxxxxx> <1359455230.2630.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130129113833.1cc959f3@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 11:38 +0100, David Disseldorp wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 21:27:10 +1100
> Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 11:14 +0100, David Disseldorp wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > Thanks, I've raised bnc#800978 to track this. FWIW the bug is not
> > > present in sysstat-10.0.5 shipped with openSUSE 12.2 and 12.3.  
> > 
> > Thanks David ... should I retire openSUSE 12.1 from my QA farm and
> > replace it with a more recent release?  And if so, should that be 12.3
> > and/or 12.2?
> 
> 12.3 is Beta, but an updated 12.2 system in the QA farm would be great.

I created a new VM for openSUSE 12.2 ... qa/511 passes just fine there.

David, could you please drop me a line when openSUSE 12.3 appears and
I'll roll my 12.1 VM to 12.3.

Thanks.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [pcp] qa/511 failing, Ken McDonell <=