pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] qa/511 failing

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] qa/511 failing
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:55:44 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <609530693.12650377.1359411301932.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <609530693.12650377.1359411301932.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 17:15 -0500, Nathan Scott wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > I am seeing qa/511 failing on some platforms (specifically openSUSE
> > 12.1
> > (i586)) ... after changing 511 to capture and report the error, it is
> > something like this ...
> > 
> 
> (that tweak should probably be committed, perhaps writing in 512.full,
> if it was needed to debug?)

Yep it is in my tree with a bunch of minor QA fixes (I've been running
across my farm again) ... will appear in my next push to oss.sgi.com

> > ==> Checking sadist/f16-sa20.bin
> > sar2pcp failed ...
> > 
> > mismatched tag at line 75, column 5, byte 4773
> > at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.2/XML/TokeParser.pm line 353
> > 
> > Not sure why this is anywhere near the xml parser, as this is clearly
> > a binary data file.
> > 
> 
> Yeah, sar2pcp converts to XML and then parses that - I'd put money on
> this being a sysstat bug in the generated XML.  Actually, ISTR ... yes,
> maybe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859102 is biting you?
> That looks very similar - *exact* match on error message.

Thanks (to Frank also) for the explanation ... I'll ignore the failure
on this platform and move onto the more interesting cases ... 8^)>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>