pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] Duplicate Names in the PMNS - seeking consensus

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Duplicate Names in the PMNS - seeking consensus
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 23:03:19 -0500 (EST)
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <00d001d0350b$a8de07a0$fa9a16e0$@internode.on.net>
References: <54BA00E9.7050504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1411235146.14188979.1421795599254.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <00d001d0350b$a8de07a0$fa9a16e0$@internode.on.net>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQDP3cuxAcpXF3/4aO/vlFsSs1/IUgFUEXvinr+3q5D+e9Q6Gw==
Thread-topic: Duplicate Names in the PMNS - seeking consensus

----- Original Message -----
> [...]
> If we go for option 1, the changes are much, much smaller because
> pmLoadNameSpace would call pmLoadASCIINameSpace with the "allow dups"
> option, and so I would not have to change pmLoadNameSpace to
> pmLoadASCIINameSpace everywhere ... 8^)>

OK, +1 from me for option #1 then.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>