| To: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: QA test 828 has started failing |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Jun 2014 02:38:55 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <53AA5017.8030906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <405933196.32075123.1403563839496.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx> <53AA5017.8030906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Thread-index: | X0fVlyHnaRN1AF8uIMG9wEHZpT9+xw== |
| Thread-topic: | QA test 828 has started failing |
----- Original Message ----- > On 24/06/14 08:50, Nathan Scott wrote: > > Hi Ken, > > > > I'm seeing 828 failing atm - looks like an unrecognised valgrind > > option is the cause? (see attached .bad file) This is on RHEL6. > > Yes I saw that also over the weekend ... I'm battling to figure out how > to deal with valgrind differences ... gimme a few days. Sure, no problem at all. > However, on the bright side, I don't think there is a risk of a code > failure here now. Yep, thanks. :) cheers. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: QA test 828 has started failing, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] A privileged pmcd co-process, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: QA test 828 has started failing, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Fwd: Re: [pcp] RFC - pmie "ruleset" extension, Ken McDonell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |