| To: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:50:09 +1100 |
| Cc: | pcp <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <2007189428.45931.1326365427326.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <2007189428.45931.1326365427326.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 21:50 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > Hi Ken, > ... OK, I've looked at a few more cases at random ... and there are enough real issues here to warrant a quick pass and fix if obviously broken. We do need some global assignment of the 353 cases to avoid stepping on one another's toes. If I might suggest splitting by code area, I could start on the libpcp ones. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] coding issues and defects uncovered by Coverity scans, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |