Re: [pcp] pcp updates - pmlc <---> pmlogger access controls

[Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ken,

----- Original Message -----
> Another item from the last developers conf call.
> [...]

Awesome.  :)

I'm seeing a QA failure on 381 - looks like the pmlc flush
command is able to get EPERM under some conditions.  Could
be a primary logger using the (pre-existing) system logger
config with a new pmlc?

Since flush is now a no-op, should this just always succeed
perhaps, independent of any permission settings?  .bad file
attached - everything else is passing for me here.

cheers.

--
Nathan

381.out.bad
Description: Binary data