pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] [PATCH] quieten pmevent?

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] [PATCH] quieten pmevent?
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 19:31:08 +1000
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1979086333.36316.1304321932600.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1979086333.36316.1304321932600.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Patch looks fine.  But I'd vote for making "quiet" the default and then
adding -v for verbose output.

On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 17:38 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I found when using pmevent and a log file, where the log file
> was only occassionally written to, that pmevent has a slightly
> annoying tendency to fill up the screen (every sample) with:
> 
> logger.perfile.xxx.records: No values available
> logger.perfile.xxx.records: No values available
> logger.perfile.xxx.records: No values available
> 
> I added a -q (quiet) option ... but perhaps we should make this
> the default, and add a -v (verbose) option ... thoughts?
> 
> cheers.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/pcp
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>