| To: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:07:02 +1100 |
| Cc: | David Smith <dsmith@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1299787346.28719.22.camel@bozo-laptop> |
| References: | <1065670774.114691299755917880.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1299787346.28719.22.camel@bozo-laptop> |
| Reply-to: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 07:02 +1100, Ken McDonell wrote: > OK there seems to be consensus ... I'll make the changes to support > instance domains for event records. This is now done in the latest round of commits to my pcp4 branch. |
| Previous by Date: | pcpqa updates, Ken McDonell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | pcp updates, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms, Ken McDonell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] [addendum] Possible problem with event record mechanisms, David Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |