Re: [pcp] Planning for PCP 4.0

[Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yep, added to the list.

On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:05 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ----- "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > With PCP 3.5 released, we've been giving some thought to the scope of
> > work to be attempted for the next major release, tentatively dubbed
> > "4.0".
> > 
> > I've drafted an initial document that reflects my initial thoughts, and
> > would encourage others to engage in a discussion on what we should be
> > adding and removing.
> 
> Could also consider making binary pmns format 2 (with checksums) the
> default now?
> 
> cheers.
>