| To: | "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] suitability of PCP for event tracing |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:02:12 +1100 |
| Cc: | Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "nathans@xxxxxxxxxx" <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, "systemtap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <systemtap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx" <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20100923221540.GA25357@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <105152664.981101284508372475.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C90397B.1040305@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100915121115.GF26765@xxxxxxxxxx> <4C9162FC.1040402@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100916010348.GJ26765@xxxxxxxxxx> <4C917BE0.40706@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4C921049.6010402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100916142400.GK26765@xxxxxxxxxx> <4C923D73.9030304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100923221540.GA25357@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
It has taken me a while to work through all of the issues here, not to mention more distractions than you could hit with a big stick. Anyway putting an array of event records inside a pmResult is not going to be too hard - see http://oss.sgi.com/~kenj/event-params.html Pushing client context through PMCD to PMDAs is a much more challenging task - see http://oss.sgi.com/~kenj/per-client-ctx.html for a proposal and discussion. Lemme know if this sounds good, bad or too ugly to contemplate ... I'll start the implementation as soon as we seem to be approaching some sort of consensus. Cheers. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Lustrecomm - Fix metric sizes, Update help, Scott Emery |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [pcp] suitability of PCP for event tracing, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Lustrecomm - Fix metric sizes, Update help, Scott Emery |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [pcp] suitability of PCP for event tracing, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |