Based on responses from Max and Greg, it seems that making these
routines go away is not going to happen.
I can certainly expand my gcov analysis to look for larger chunks of
functionality that are untested by the current QA suite.
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:40 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ----- "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I'm suggesting that we remove all the asynchronous PMAPI extensions
> > from libpcp as part of a PCP 4.0 goal.
> > ...
> > 5. there is zero QA coverage for the asynchronous routines (I was
> > recently doing some gcov analysis in pmns.c which brings this issue
> > into stark relief and triggered this mail).
>
> Sounds good to me. I wonder if there's any other completely unused
> routines too (maybe the QA gcov would help find those too? or at
> least be a starting point for making a list).
>
> cheers.
>
|