| To: | Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [pcp] problem with perl pmdas |
| From: | Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 07 Aug 2009 11:24:23 +1000 |
| Cc: | pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1205276153.1845531249604285361.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1205276153.1845531249604285361.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
OK, I've reverted my change. On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 10:18 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > ----- "Ken McDonell" <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > OK, but I'm still going to push for my libcp patch. > > The Perl PMDAs run in their own process group, and use the > pid == 0 argument to ensure all children are terminated (we > don't necessarily have pids to explicitly kill them, so it > signals the group). > > cheers. > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [pcp] Question about Linux's kernel.all.cpu.* metrics, Martin Hicks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | network.inteface.in.bytes problem, Siekas, Greg |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [pcp] problem with perl pmdas, Nathan Scott |
| Next by Thread: | Question about Linux's kernel.all.cpu.* metrics, Martin Hicks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |