On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 20:39 +1000, Max wrote:
>
> On 15/06/2009, at 17:02, Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> > In this context, is anyone interested in the extension I've been
> > mulling
> > over to make parts of the pmns truly dynamic, and avoiding the whole
> > build a pmns file, merge into the global pmns and SIGHUP pmcd circus?
> >
> As long as adding version 4 of pmda protocol is not going to result in
> premature dodoisation of the current pmdas it would be great
Max, you should know better than that. PMDA_INTERFACE_4 will not
invalidate any existing PMDA.
This change is non-trivial, which is why I plan posting a design
document to the list for comment before sending bits into the git
bucket.
I hope to be able to post the design document within the week.
|