pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: QA test 319

To: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: QA test 319
From: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:11:10 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <745686509.380061237418349120.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <745686509.380061237418349120.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No.  Unfortunately it is an odd corner case in pmie where the code is
just wrong.

I sort of left the failing qa test to keep reminding me to fix the code,
but every time I look into the code I get depressed and decide it is
more important to weed the garden or cut firewood.

On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 10:19 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> 
> Could I get you to take a look at your recent pmie test 319, which
> is failing consistently for me with TOT pmie ... looks like theres
> a spurious/unexpected rule evaluation to false in the middle of the
> and/or checks with empty instance domains.  I can't remember, but I
> suspect you added code later which makes this output correct?
> 
> Probably just a .out file remake needed...?
> 
> thanks.
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>