pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] more pcp-2.7.8-20081117 sig 11 in AcceptNewClient

To: Scott Emery <emery@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] more pcp-2.7.8-20081117 sig 11 in AcceptNewClient
From: Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:00:48 +1100
Cc: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200903040055.n240tjSE26519952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200903040055.n240tjSE26519952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 18:55 -0600, Scott Emery wrote:
>       It may be that the default optimization caused the pmcd
> core to be confusing.   I have rebuilt pmcd with "-g -O0". I await
> a similar failure to test my hypothesis.

Could be.  Also, I should point out that we have many many pmcd's
running here, for many years now, on both i386 and x86_64 and I've
never observed a pmcd core in all that time.

I do, however, know of one other person on an SGI Altix platform
who has had a similar issue (wouldn't let me take a closer look
though, even though they're here in Melbourne, and pretty sure
they never reported it to SGI customer support either).

So, it could be something SGI/SuSE-specific?  (I'm on Debian and
RHEL4/5).  Compiler version, optimisation level, libc version
... something like that, perhaps, could be root cause here.  Ken
had a dazzling array of spectacular failures that were toolchain
related too, in the past, but that was on Ubuntu.

cheers.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>