Re: [pcp] Source and binary packaging - future directions

[Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 18:23 -0800, Kevin Wang wrote:
> From Nathan Scott:
> > - move pcpqa tree contents (back) into "qa" subdirectory in the
> > pcp-collector git tree, so its clear what that is for.  kmchart
> > (aka pcp-monitor) already has a "qa" subdirectory.
> 
> Not knowing what's in there, I ask naievely:  why not 'test' or 'tests'?

Why indeed.  No reason I know of, QA (quality assurance) was
the term used for testing on the pcp project from day 1 ....
blame Ken, I guess.  I could go with "tests" ... may make it
easier to merge, back at the SGI ptools ranch - Mort?

thanks.

--
Nathan