Re: [pcp] PCP bugs found so far at LCA

[Nathan Scott <nscott@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 07:58 +1100, Ken McDonell wrote:
> I've audited the code, added some debug and it looks algorithmically
> correct.  I think this is a problem with the granularity of time
> accounting being different for real time versus the cpu times.

Yep, sure looks that way - thanks Ken.

> You can see the same issue independent of shping ... see NOTE cases
> below.
> 
> For more serious commands that run longer than a few milliseconds, I
> suspect this would be less of a problem.

*nod*

cheers.

--
Nathan