pcp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [pcp] pmatop qa failures

To: Ken McDonell <kenj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [pcp] pmatop qa failures
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 03:37:49 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: PCP <pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: pcp@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <55768B3A.5070206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <55768B3A.5070206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: YgohWfCmm3Ax879kvkVs7v37t6ULpQ==
Thread-topic: pmatop qa failures

----- Original Message -----
> I'm seeing above average failure rates for 1079 and 1080
> 
> 1079 looks like the archive create is requesting metrics that don't
> necessarily exist and then the replay is not checking the archive correctly
> ... using an instance identifier that is not defined in the archive should
> not happen, I suspect.
> + pcp-atop: lvm instances: Instance domain identifier not defined in the PCP

Hmm, I've not come across this one - ahh, I see what it'll be - something
to do with a different/non-existant LVM setups on the QA host (and likely
mishandling on recording by the tool).  I'll dig deeper tomorrow.

> And I'm seeing lots of variants of valgrind failures for 1080.  This is
> representative

Lukas has reported this one too - I've reproduced it on one of my systems
now, so should have that fix tomorrow also.

thanks Ken.

--
Nathan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>